Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2017-05-19 04:30:37 UTC
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
5W per card in the current standard, with an "option" to increasesize, power budget. in about 5-8 years it won't be an issue.
EOMA200 is better suited to clustering. bigger PCB size and a much
higher power budget.
I'm not really concerned about size. What do you mean by power budget?EOMA200 is better suited to clustering. bigger PCB size and a much
higher power budget.
that to 10W *if the housing supports it*. that means having
sufficient thermal cooling/
What's to stop me or anyone else from buying, say, 8x EOMA68's and
networking them?
nothing.networking them?
(gigabit or otherwise)?
no ethernet. USB3 *if the Card supports it*... which the A20 doesn't.Assuming that a backplane is the
only thing in the way, that could happen pretty easily. The only other
thing missing at that point would be availability of the 1st gen cards, but
that should get better in time, I'd think. Cost wise it's still less than
an Intel NUC, if you're not counting the cost of the backplane.
you can't get a 1000 pin 15W *processor* nor can you get 128-bit-wideonly thing in the way, that could happen pretty easily. The only other
thing missing at that point would be availability of the 1st gen cards, but
that should get better in time, I'd think. Cost wise it's still less than
an Intel NUC, if you're not counting the cost of the backplane.
DDR3 memory bus bandwidth into an EOMA68 case. ok the latter you
might be able to do if you used 4x 32-bit-wide LPDDR3 RAM ICs but the
entire 5W power budget would be blown on running the RAM even at only
around 1066mhz.
_______________________________________________
arm-netbook mailing list arm-***@lists.phcomp.co.uk
http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook
Send large attachments to arm-***@files.phcomp